Supporters of Brittney Griner’s punishment distressingly wrong

As all the time and without end, it relies upon. It is dependent upon heaps of issues, from the way you had been raised, to your sense of proper and wrong, as to whether you’ve gotten an obstructed view.

Friday on this area, I wrote in regards to the excessively harsh punishment — 9 years in a penal labor colony — given to WNBA star and US Olympic gold medalist Brittney Griner by a Russian court docket for carrying pot oil and a vape pipe.

I wrote that whereas I used to be no fan of Griner’s demonstration of turning her again on our shared nationwide anthem, excessively merciless punishment for minor crimes must not ever be indulged, not to mention smugly supported.

In view of Russia’s invasion of the Ukraine, it is doubtless Griner’s sentence got here connected to geopolitical retribution in opposition to a US citizen, thus had extra to do together with her punishment than her crime.

I anticipated a blended response, however not the stridency from those that advocated that she “deserves to rot in jail.”

That was distressing. Just slam the jail door on her, goodbye and good riddance? See ya, perhaps, in 2031!

My daughters, now adults, one with two daughters, will let you know about their previous man’s Open Door Policy, that when getting into and leaving shops I’d maintain the door open for others, typically for an “extreme” quantity of time, they stated .

Brittney Griner
Supporters of Brittney Griner’s punishment are distressingly incorrect.
Reuters

They’d even remark that folks typically did not hassle to say “Thank you,” thus I used to be a double idiot.

And each time I defined that I did not maintain the door for “them” however “for me,” to make me really feel higher.

Calling for Griner’s punishment to be significantly diminished — if not suspended — has nothing to do with Griner’s private politics, and all the things to do with what’s proper, primarily based on her standing as each a human and a US citizen.

Who amongst us does not have a cherished one of any age whom we regard as politically naive, even silly, ungrateful for the liberty to protest no matter they selected? Would we advocate that they rot in a penal colony for 9 years? Would we permit ourselves to turn out to be embittered?

Or would we actively help their expedited return to freedom as they’d been so clearly denied affordable justice for a minor crime?

Would we not maintain the shop door open as a result of a person or lady with political opinions apart from ours was approaching? Should we act on our most petty ideas?

Brittney Griner's punishment is excessive, regardless of personal beliefs.
Brittney Griner’s punishment is extreme, regardless of private beliefs.
Getty Images

In 1770, John Adams, a Massachusetts lawyer who lent his mind and soul to the American Revolution and went on to turn out to be the second US president, risked his life and liberty to defend British troops accused of homicide within the Boston Massacre, which left 5 colonists lifeless

Adams was vilified by claims of his treason and tyranny as a result of he felt the aggressors weren’t the British, however a mob of his anti-British confederates. The information instructed him the Redcoats, about to be engulfed by a throng, fired in self-defense.

That Adams resented the Crown for having shipped troops to Boston was irrelevant. And irrespective of his private peril, Adams needed a good trial.

Adams gained the troops’ acquittal, saving their lives. Physically brief and unimposing, he was exceedingly courageous.

Should Brittney Griner rot in a Russian labor jail for the subsequent 9 years resulting from her repugnant unpatriotic positions as a WNBA star with some she-knew-better hashish oil thrown in? positive If that makes you’re feeling higher, positive.

Division III sport a real first-rate occasion

Who says we will not have good issues?

Our Person of the Week is Mark Holtzman, head of non-baseball occasions at Yankee Stadium, who put collectively the wildly profitable 63rd Cortaca Jug sport final Saturday in The Bronx.

The Cortaca Jug might sound like a yacht race, but it surely’s the annual rivalry soccer sport — a civil rivalry, versus too many others — between Ithaca College and SUNY-Cortland, their campuses 21 miles aside.

This yr, each groups got here in with 9-0 data.

More than 40,000 had been reported to have proven up in Yankee Stadium to observe a Division III sport — the very best school sport seen on TV that day — gained by Ithaca, 34-17, as seen reside on YES. And enrollment of the 2 faculties mixed is about 11,000.

Ithaca grad Bruce Beck referred to as the sport — enjoying it down the center — and appeared thrilled all through that it was given such big-time consideration by followers, college students, alums, TV and Yankee Stadium with Holtzman’s ideas, urgings and vitality.

And it was a clear, well-played sport, shut till virtually the tip. It felt good to really feel good, once more, watching a university soccer sport.


More than just a few celeb endorsers have been named in a category motion swimsuit claiming they lent — bought — their fame, reputations and credibility to the ill-defined, blind-faith cryptocurrency dealer FTX. FTX lately collapsed, dropping a reported, gulp, $32 billion.

Come-and-get-it (no matter it was) FTX Endorsers named as co-defendants within the swimsuit embrace Larry David, Tom Brady, Giselle Bündchen, Shaq O’Neal, Naomi Osaka and Stephen Curry.

You pondering what I’m pondering? If one of these large leagues-certified, radio and TV-pitched, private promo code-carrying and celebrity-endorsed sports activities playing operations equally collapses, there may very well be extra co-defendants than a prosecutor may stuff in a briefcase.


The Devils have been hit by some magical spell that has made them the very best offensive zone passing staff on the town — together with the Knicks and Nets.


Another nose-to-nose Sunday in New York, each at 1 pm: Jets-Pats, CBS, Kevin Harlan with Trent Green; Lions-Giants, Fox, Kevin Burkhardt with Greg Olsen. If the NFL’s TV companions solely knew what they know now, a minimum of one NY staff could be kicking off at 4:05 — on the earliest.

Goodell buries head within the sand

Despite the Packers’ depressing season, RB Aaron Jones had the self-awareness and dignity to seize his crotch whereas scoring in opposition to the Cowboys on Sunday.

Sick of this vulgar, copied gesture, and anxious that the NFL is dropping decent-headed viewers and prospects to impudent acts, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell erupted, publicly rebuking Jones whereas threatening most fines and suspensions to the subsequent participant who would so deliberately place the NFL in such indefensible public disrepute.

Aaron Jones grabs his crotch while celebrating a touchdown against the Cowboys.
Aaron Jones grabs his crotch whereas celebrating a landing in opposition to the Cowboys.
AP

“I can’t permit my stewardship to quietly endure such rank, intentional misconduct on our enjoying fields in entrance of our followers,” Goodell stated in a extensively distributed assertion. “Such habits should finish.”

Yeah, positive he did.

Once once more, Goodell, the pandering coward, did and stated nothing — a minimum of not in public. Having turned the Super Bowl halftime present into an X-rated, crotch-grab pageant, his nice regard for the larger good — for proper over wrong — couldn’t be much less evident.

Try doing what Jones did in Goodell’s and his household’s faces. See if he is good with that.


Graphic of the Week gained, once more, by ESPN. Monday after Eagles WR DeVonta Smith’s TD catch: “First Player In NFL History With Rec. TD On Birthday In Back-To-Back Seasons.”

Imagine being assigned to analysis that one: “Say, Kevin, what are you doing, this week? Can it wait? Here’s what I would like you to do…

The subsequent time a TV community encourages you to contemplate a QB’s “passer score” assume what Kenny Golladay has performed for Daniel Jones’.

Leave a Comment